| |
|
|
Getting Real has moved to
ChicagoNow
but occasionally you will be able to find additional posts here.
Friday, November 20th, 2009 by Gary Lucido
Earlier today I received an email from 1400 S. Michigan – Tower II promoting recent price reductions with the subject line “Auction Pricing without the Auction!” Basically they are claiming that they’ve lowered their asking prices to the auction levels. Well, if you can buy a unit at the same price as at auction then that’s a pretty good deal because you can do so at a more leisurely pace and without all the auction mania going on. Let’s see if this claim holds water.
Unit 1312, 1 bedroom/ 1 bath and 692 sq ft has been cut from $253,990 to $182,990. That compares with unit 1812, which sold for $182,000 at auction. Well, that’s a higher floor but let’s assume there is some room for negotiation on unit 1312 – though developers don’t usually like to negotiate.
Unit 1508, 1 bedroom +/ 1 bath and 751 sq ft has been cut from $268,990 to $199,990. That compares with unit 2008, which sold for $204,000 at auction, which seems reasonably fair – lower price for a lower floor.
Unit 2707, 2 bedroom/ 2 bath and 1259 sq ft has been cut from $490,990 to $378,990. That compares with unit 2607, which sold for $336,000 at auction. So I would not say that unit 2707 is available at auction prices. This one is much higher.
Oh…and they might want to update their MLS listings. The bulk of their listings that are showing as active were sold at auction. I think that violates some kind of MLS rule.
Posted in Condos/Townhomes, Market Insights, News | No Comments »
Sunday, November 15th, 2009 by Gary Lucido
Today I attended the condo auction for 1400 S Michigan Avenue – Tower II held at the W Hotel on Adams St. in Chicago – along with about 300 -500 other people. 43 condos were auctioned off in about 1 1/2 hours at an discount off of the last list price of about 26%. Here are the results sorted by exposure and unit number (you may want to check out the floorplans at the link above):
| Unit # |
Unit
Type |
Sq.
Ft. |
Exposure |
Last
Asking Price |
Auction
Price |
Discount |
Auction Price /SF |
Assessments |
| 500 |
Studio / 1BA |
580 |
East |
$135,900 |
$160,000 |
-18% |
$276 |
$239 |
| 1107 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
North |
$264,900 |
$198,000 |
25% |
$264 |
$293 |
| 1507 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
North |
$266,000 |
$202,000 |
24% |
$269 |
$306 |
| 2107 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
North |
??? |
$218,000 |
??? |
$290 |
??? |
| 2205 |
1BD + /1BA |
825 |
North |
$305,000 |
$243,000 |
20% |
$295 |
$359 |
| 2505 |
1BD + /1BA |
825 |
North |
$316,000 |
$251,000 |
21% |
$304 |
$375 |
| 2507 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
North |
$306,900 |
$222,000 |
28% |
$296 |
$371 |
| 2605 |
2BD /2BA |
1,144 |
North |
$520,000 |
$296,000 |
43% |
$259 |
$488 |
| 2705 |
2BD /2BA |
1,144 |
North |
$525,000 |
$317,000 |
40% |
$277 |
$491 |
| 703 |
2BD /2BA |
1,260 |
Northeast |
$429,900 |
$302,000 |
30% |
$240 |
$444 |
| 1203 |
3BD /3BA |
2,120 |
Northeast |
$682,000 |
$601,000 |
12% |
$283 |
$764 |
| 2603 |
3BD /2BA |
1,540 |
Northeast |
??? |
$506,000 |
??? |
$329 |
??? |
| 809 |
2BD /2BA |
1,027 |
Northwest |
$345,900 |
$274,000 |
21% |
$267 |
$381 |
| 1409 |
2BD /2BA |
1,027 |
Northwest |
$363,900 |
$279,000 |
23% |
$272 |
$400 |
| 1509 |
2BD /2BA |
1,027 |
Northwest |
$366,900 |
$281,000 |
23% |
$274 |
$403 |
| 2009 |
2BD /2BA |
1,027 |
Northwest |
$381,900 |
$286,000 |
25% |
$278 |
$419 |
| 2309 |
2BD /2BA |
1,027 |
Northwest |
$390,900 |
$285,000 |
27% |
$278 |
$446 |
| 2509 |
2BD /2BA |
1,027 |
Northwest |
$395,900 |
$297,000 |
25% |
$289 |
$460 |
| 2607 |
2BD /2BA |
1,259 |
Northwest |
$559,000 |
$336,000 |
40% |
$267 |
$524 |
| 1906 |
1BD /1BA |
783 |
South |
$302,900 |
$218,000 |
28% |
$278 |
$318 |
| 2006 |
1BD /1BA |
783 |
South |
$305,900 |
$221,000 |
28% |
$282 |
$321 |
| 2008 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
South |
$276,000 |
$204,000 |
26% |
$272 |
$314 |
| 2106 |
1BD /1BA |
783 |
South |
$308,900 |
$219,000 |
29% |
$280 |
$351 |
| 2108 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
South |
$279,900 |
$211,000 |
25% |
$281 |
$350 |
| 2208 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
South |
$282,900 |
$208,000 |
26% |
$277 |
$353 |
| 2306 |
1BD /1BA |
783 |
South |
$314,900 |
$220,000 |
30% |
$281 |
$357 |
| 2308 |
1BD + /1BA |
751 |
South |
$285,900 |
$212,000 |
26% |
$282 |
$356 |
| 2506 |
1BD /1BA |
783 |
South |
$320,900 |
$220,000 |
31% |
$281 |
$371 |
| 2802 |
2BD /2BA |
1,115 |
South |
$439,900 |
$317,000 |
28% |
$284 |
$510 |
| 1104 |
2BD /2BA |
1,260 |
Southeast |
$435,900 |
$326,000 |
25% |
$259 |
$405 |
| 2602 |
3BD /3BA |
1,540 |
Southeast |
$650,990 |
$457,000 |
30% |
$297 |
??? |
| 2510 |
2BD /2BA |
1,027 |
Southwest |
$391,900 |
$305,000 |
22% |
$297 |
$449 |
| 2606 |
2BD /2BA |
1,259 |
Southwest |
$559,000 |
$338,000 |
40% |
$268 |
$521 |
| 2706 |
2BD /2BA |
1,259 |
Southwest |
$446,900 |
$327,000 |
27% |
$260 |
$532 |
| 1211 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$239,000 |
$180,000 |
25% |
$260 |
$277 |
| 1812 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$238,900 |
$182,000 |
24% |
$263 |
$294 |
| 1911 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$238,900 |
$182,000 |
24% |
$263 |
$300 |
| 1912 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$240,900 |
$186,000 |
23% |
$269 |
$298 |
| 2011 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$241,900 |
$185,000 |
24% |
$267 |
$303 |
| 2212 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$243,900 |
$188,000 |
23% |
$272 |
$310 |
| 2311 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$246,900 |
$183,000 |
26% |
$264 |
$317 |
| 2312 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$246,900 |
$188,000 |
24% |
$272 |
$314 |
| 2512 |
1BD /1BA |
692 |
West |
$252,900 |
$182,000 |
28% |
$263 |
$317 |
There are several interesting observations from this auction:
- You will notice that unit 500, which is a studio, actually went for more than the last list price. Regardless of what you think it was worth, we can only conclude that when this unit was on the market people were not aware of its availability. Otherwise the bidders could have bought it then for a lot less.
- I don’t show the auction sequence here but they auctioned off the higher floors first. In several instances the lower floors then went at a higher price – e.g. units 2512 and 2312. I’m thinking that either people incorrectly assumed that the higher bidders would be taken out in the earlier round or they developed remorse that they didn’t get the higher floor.
- It looks like the developer was trying to get about a $3K premium per floor. However, the auction only assigned a premium like that about half the time.
- Unit 2602 seemed overpriced relative to 1203 and in fact the auction gave it a bigger discount.
- I was surprised that the south and west views went for as high prices as they did vs. the north and east views.
- When they say get there an hour ahead of time you should if you want to get free food and good seats.
Posted in Condos/Townhomes, News | 2 Comments »
Thursday, November 5th, 2009 by Gary Lucido
I know that many of you must have had your hearts broken yesterday when you showed up with your $250,000 checks to bid on Villa Taj in Burr Ridge, the house that once was listed at $25 million. Apparently, the auctioneer pulled the property from the auction at the last minute after several of you indicated that you didn’t want to bid on it but were interested in buying it the old fashioned way. So, this modest and unpretentious home will be relisted soon – for about $12 MM. I would appreciate an invitation to the housewarming from whoever buys it.
Posted in Bizarre, Human Interest, News | 3 Comments »
|
| |
|