Nothing irritates me more than a lack of basic ethics among certain Chicago real estate professionals. It’s an endemic problem in the industry, and one that motivated me to enter the industry. However, maybe there’s such a thing as real estate Karma, as my recent experience with a certain real estate developer has led me to believe.
The names in this story are being withheld to protect the guilty and to protect me from a slander lawsuit. Of course, if it’s true then it’s not slander but then I would have to pay my lawyer to prove it and I like my lawyer but I would rather not pay him for defending me against a slander claim.
The story begins with my client who was looking for a condo. We finally found what appeared to be a nice garden unit. However, on a subsequent visit to the property we encountered one of the other residents of the building who not so subtly let it be known that he and his wife were having issues with the developer. They had been the first people to buy in the building and they had a laundry list of problems that they felt the developer needed to address. However, according to them, the developer was either not responsive or didn’t fix things properly. Since they mentioned that many of these issues had been uncovered during an inspection of the property I asked them if I could see a copy of their inspection report. Karma #1: the developer had unresolved issues with a buyer and now it was coming back to haunt them. Oh…did I mention that the property had been on the market since August of 2007, starting at $219,000 and was now listed at $169,000?
I then went through this issue list with the developer who either claimed that the issues had subsequently been fixed or that they really weren’t problems or that they would be fixed. My client and I discussed our strategy and decided to make an offer contingent upon some important subset of these issues being fixed. Once we did that it became much clearer exactly where the developer was on each of these issues and what they were willing to do: not much. In addition, some problems that were supposed to have been fixed “next week” had still not been fixed. So our mistrust of this developer was growing rapidly. I’ll skip past a few rounds of negotiations but let’s just say that we dropped our upper limit in order to compensate for the problems and our mistrust of the developer.
Finally we agreed on terms and scheduled the inspection but between the last time we had seen the unit and the inspection it had rained – rather heavily. I think you can see where this is going – especially since this was a garden unit. When the inspector arrived he didn’t even set down his bag before pointing out that not only did the unit have water damage but that there had been an attempt to hide it. The lower two feet of many of the walls had been repainted. The inspector also found evidence of mold and, as a side note, there were serious deficiencies in the electrical wiring. That’s 3 material defects that are required disclosures by law.
We ran into that other resident of the building again and he confirmed that he had seen workmen in the unit during the past couple of weeks replacing carpeting and drywall – repairs that are purely cosmetic and won’t stop the water from coming in. I think that pretty much killed the deal right there. Within a week the listing price dropped to $159,000 and a week later it dropped to $155,000. Did I mention that when I went by the developer’s office to present the offer there were several large Mercedes in the parking lot?
Fast forward to Monday of this week. It rains in biblical proportions. Tuesday morning the listing on this unit is canceled. Coincidence? I think not. Let’s just say that in response to an inquiry my sources have now confirmed that there was extensive damage to the unit and once again the developer is making cosmetic repairs. Karma #2: they didn’t fix it correctly and now they are having to fix it again.
This is a rather interesting situation. The developer is required to disclose these problems to potential buyers. Think they will? If they don’t they can be sued by the buyer. If they do who is going to buy the place? Or will the developer just throw in a lifetime supply of drywall and carpeting? If the developer doesn’t fix the water leakage do they expect the condo association to fix it? There is a paper trail a mile long documenting this problem and there are numerous witnesses to the aftermath. Think the association will allow themselves to get stuck with this problem?
What goes around comes around.